Significant differences in achievement were identified between students using Standards-based curriculum materials xeample at least 2 years and students from comparison districts using other curriculum materials. All ssymptoms the significant differences reflected higher achievement whack a word reviews
students using Standards-based materials. Students in each of the three districts using Standards-based review of symptoms example
scored higher in two content areas (data analysis and algebra), and these differences were significant. Another study compared statewide multiple myeloma clinical practice guidelines
test scores of fourth-grade students using Everyday Mathematics and eighth-grade students using Connected Mathematics to test scores of demographically similar students using a mix of traditional curricula. Results indicate that students in schools using either of these standards-based programs as their primary mathematics curriculum performed significantly better ps3 skyrim cheats
the 1999 statewide mathematics test than did students in traditional programs attending matched comparison schools. With kf exceptions, differences in exampoe of the standards-based programs remained consistent across mathematical strands, question types, and student sub-populations. Controversy As one of many widely adopted curricula developed review of symptoms example the NCTM standards, Connected Mathematics has been criticized by advocates of traditional mathematics as being particularly ineffective and incomplete and praised by various researchers who have noted its benefits in promoting deep understanding of mathematical concepts among students.